Article

How I-9 Errors Affect Mergers, Acquisitions & Corporate Audits

Compliance Best Practices
Form I-9
ICE Audits
1
minutes to read
Business handshake during a merger or acquisition meeting, symbolizing HR due diligence and I-9 compliance risk in corporate audits.  

How I-9 Errors Affect Mergers, Acquisitions, and Corporate Audits

I-9 errors affect mergers and acquisitions in ways many organizations don’t anticipate until due diligence begins. Workforce authorization compliance has become a central component of risk evaluation for buyers, private equity firms, lenders, and internal audit teams. Missing I-9s, incorrect forms, document mismatches, and improper remote verification are no longer “HR housekeeping”—they are deal-impacting liabilities.

The impact is so significant that M&A attorneys and corporate immigration experts now treat I-9 compliance as a core diligence category. In a recent conversation between i9 Intelligence CEO Jed Butler and Morgan Lewis immigration attorney Eric Bord, the growing centrality of I-9 compliance in transactions became unmistakable.

To understand why this matters, and how I-9 gaps influence valuations, timelines, and post-closing risks, we break down the errors most commonly discovered during M&A and corporate audits—and how employers can reduce exposure before a transaction.

Why I-9 Compliance Matters in Mergers and Acquisitions

During any acquisition, the buyer assumes the workforce-related liabilities of the acquired entity unless negotiated otherwise. That means historical I-9 violations—missing forms, incorrect reverifications, document issues, or the absence of required audit trails—can materially affect:

  • Valuation and deal structure
  • Timing of due diligence
  • Representations, warranties, and escrow holdbacks
  • Buyer confidence and legal exposure
  • Post-close remediation costs
  • Risk of future ICE audits

I-9 errors often reveal deeper structural concerns about onboarding consistency, internal controls, HR documentation management, and regulatory readiness.

Even banks and financing partners increasingly require I-9 audit validation before funding M&A transactions.

The Most Common I-9 Errors Discovered During M&A Due Diligence

M&A legal teams, external auditors, and immigration specialists regularly uncover patterns such as:

Missing or Uncollected I-9 Forms

Payroll-to-I-9 mismatches remain one of the most damaging findings. As attorney Eric Bord shared in his conversation with Jed Butler, missing I-9s can be serious enough to cause deals to collapse.

Incorrect or Outdated Form Versions

Using a retired I-9 form—even unintentionally—is a technical violation that can multiply quickly across a workforce.

Wrong or Incomplete Information in Section 1 or 2

These issues include:

  • Wrong dates
  • Incorrect document codes
  • Citizenship mismatches
  • Missing signatures
  • Illegible entries

Improper Remote Verification

Companies that attempted remote verification outside DHS rules or used inconsistent workflows across locations will face remediation demands.

Missing or Late Reverification

Common for employees with temporary work authorization and high-turnover industries.

Duplicate or Conflicting I-9s

Multiple forms for the same employee with mismatched data create significant risk flags for buyers and auditors.

Missing Audit Trails in Electronic Systems

One of the biggest M&A pitfalls today: electronic I-9 PDFs provided by the seller without any audit trail. As Bord explained: “When a buyer receives pristine PDFs but no audit trail, they essentially don’t have valid I-9s.”

How I-9 Errors Create Financial and Legal Risk in M&A

1. Fines and Penalties Transfer to the Buyer

Penalties run up to $28,619 per violation, depending on the type and severity.

Related: I-9 Penalties 2025.

2. Delayed or Abandoned Transactions

Due diligence may pause or fall apart entirely if workforce documentation is unreliable.

3. Escrow, Holdbacks, or Renegotiated Deal Terms

Buyers may require significant concessions based on perceived risk.

4. Post-Closing Remediation Costs

Correcting I-9 issues after acquisition is expensive, time-consuming, and operationally disruptive.

5. Elevated ICE Audit Risk

Missing, inconsistent, or undocumented I-9s signal regulatory vulnerability.

This growing impact was a major theme in Jed Butler’s discussion with attorney Eric Bord. Jed summarized it this way:

“What struck me most when speaking with Eric was just how often I-9 compliance is now determining the outcome of deals. We’re not talking about small oversight issues—some companies are seeing transactions delayed, devalued, or even fall apart entirely because their I-9s weren’t in order. In today’s environment, compliance isn’t a back-office function anymore. It’s a deal readiness requirement.” — Jed Butler, CEO, i9 Intelligence

This aligns with what venture capital firms, private equity funds, and lenders increasingly demand: documented, auditable I-9 compliance before capital changes hands.

I-9 Issues That Concern Private Equity, Venture Investors, and Corporate Auditors

Investors and audit committees evaluate I-9 compliance as part of operational maturity. They look for:

  • Scalable onboarding processes
  • Document retention controls
  • Risk exposure across multi-location teams
  • Consistency in remote verification
  • E-Verify management accuracy
  • Fraud detection readiness
  • Payroll-to-I-9 alignment

I-9 issues can materially affect:

  • Valuation
  • Closing timelines
  • The buyer’s perception of operational risk
  • HRIS modernization requirements
  • Post-close integration planning

Corporate Audits: Why I-9 Errors Are a Persistent Red Flag

Internal auditors, compliance teams, and external reviewers often find:

  • Missing or late documentation
  • Form version inconsistencies
  • Conflicting employment authorization records
  • Improper or undocumented remote verification
  • Lack of audit trails for electronic I-9s
  • Poorly executed reverification workflows

These findings frequently lead executives to commission a full third-party I-9 audit prior to regulatory scrutiny, diligence, or SOX/IPO readiness.

How to Identify I-9 Risk Before a Transaction or Audit

1. Conduct an Internal Self-Audit

Useful as a starting point, but internal teams often lack time and expertise.

2. Implement Digital I-9 Software

Automation reduces human error and standardizes document review.

3. Use a Third-Party I-9 Audit Service

This is now standard practice in M&A because it provides:

  • Unbiased, ICE-aligned methodology
  • Consolidation of paper + digital I-9s
  • Audit trail validation
  • Risk scoring and a structured correction plan

Discover our I-9 Audit capabilities and how we can support your audit process.

4. Audit Early in the Deal Cycle

The best time to evaluate I-9 risk is:

  • Pre-LOI
  • Early in diligence
  • Before submitting information to buyers or regulators

Strengthen Your Compliance Before an M&A Deal or Corporate Audit

I-9 errors affect mergers, acquisitions, and corporate audits more than ever before. Deals are slowing down, values are being adjusted, and some transactions are failing entirely due to undocumented or incomplete I-9 programs.

A structured third-party audit ensures:

  • Missing forms are identified
  • Errors are corrected
  • Documentation is validated
  • Audit trails are verified
  • Risk is minimized before diligence begins

Ready to protect your organization before an audit or a transaction?

Schedule a free consultation and see how an I-9 audit can strengthen your compliance program.